This perfect competition market, the profit margin



This question was answered with a for
and against argument structure, with a concluded answer to illustrate how
perfect competition is always in the interest of the consumers.


In my conclusion, perfect competition
is always in the consumer’s best interest as the outstanding factor is the low
prices that consumers get for their products and services. In addition another
beneficial factor is that consumers ultimately have more power in the market
over its firms as perfect competition is a consumer oriented market meaning if
sellers displease a consumer then the consumer can easily choose to go to
another firms as the prices are low everywhere which ultimately keeps firms
alert. Furthermore firms lack monopoly pricing power which allows consumers not
to be exploited by the firms and the firms will not be able to put costs back
up as there will not be any long-run supernormal profits to add to the costs
which is again beneficial for the consumers. (Sloman, 2003, p. 158)

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now


Moreover in perfect competition
location plays a key role as firms that have the best locations usually generate
the most sales rather than a firm that is not in a prime location. Hence the
reason a location may play its part in a perfect competition market. However
there may be limitations in customer service and product features which will
lead to customers having more problems with their sellers due to the lack of
customer service (Parikh, 2015).


The major disadvantage for consumers
in perfect competition is that sellers will have no inducement to innovate or
add more features to their product because in a perfect competition market, the
profit margin is fixed and the sellers cannot charge higher prices as this may
drive customers away. Hence why the sellers choose to keep selling their
standard product at a price fixed by the market forces of supply and demand. In
addition this will affect the consumer as they won’t see an improvement in
their product and this may lead to frustration over time as sellers will be to
hesitant due to the current climate of the market (Parikh, 2015).


Furthermore perfect competition is a
consumer orientated market meaning that sellers can’t afford to displease the
consumer as they can quickly shift from one seller to another, hence the reason
that perfect competition gives the consumers pleasure is because they can shift
from one seller to another if they are displeased with the services or product.
Another major advantage is that sellers will not possess any monopoly pricing
power which leads to consumer exploitation being very low as well as not having
much of an impact on the price of product or change the price higher than
normal for the consumer (Parikh, 2015) .


Perfect competition can be seen as being
in the consumer’s best interest by the prices being low as there are no long
run supernormal profits to add to the costs of the service or product. In addition,
consumers have the power to manipulate the market by tasting change, which will
lead firms to respond, as well as increased consumer demand. This will lead to
firms calling upon more supply with only a short run increase in profit and
these two points lead to customer sovereignty (a situation that leads to firms
responding to changes in consumer demand without being in a position to change
it in the long run over its average cost). (Sloman, 2003, p. 158)




The short run and the long run apply
to perfect competition. During the short run in perfect competition, there is
too little time for new firms to enter the industry meaning the number of firms
stay fixed, depending on its costs and revenue or profit and loss. In the long
run under perfect competition the period of time will be long enough for new
firms to ultimately enter the industry. However this is dependent on the profit
and loss, reason being if the profits are high this will ultimately attract new
firms to the industry whereas if there is losses this will lead to firms
leaving the industry. (Sloman, 2003, p. 150)


competition is built of five assumptions that create a market structure; firstly,
all firms sell an identical product that is homogeneous which leads to no
branding and advertising in their products. Secondly all firms are price takers
and they cannot control the market price on their product as they have small
portions of the industry supply and therefore they cannot affect the market
price of a product. Thirdly all the firms have a reasonably small market share.
Fourthly buyers obtain complete information about the product being sold and
the changes of prices by firms. Fifthly the industry is distinguished by the
freedom of entry and exit meaning existing firms are unable to stop new firms
setting up their businesses. (Anon., 2017)
(Sloman, 2003, p. 150)