Designing multiple users in neighboring cells. To solve

Designing of an
Optimized Pilot Beam Pattern For MU-MIMO Systems

 

Abstract—In   this   project,  channel 
 estimation   
for  massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems with a large number of transmit antennas at
 the  base  station
 is considered, and
 a new algorithm for pilot  beam  pattern design
 for optimal channel  estimation  under the assumption of Gauss-Markov channel  processes is proposed. The proposed algorithm
designs the optimal pilot beam pattern sequentially by exploiting the statistics of the channel, antenna correlation, and temporal correlation. The algorithm provides a sequentially
optimal sequence of pilot beam patterns for a given set of system
parameters. Numerical
results show the effectiveness
of the proposed algorithm.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

 

  LITERATUR
 SURVEY

MIMO systems which
are using very large number of transmitting antennas and receiving antennas at
the base station are called massive MIMO systems. This is an active research
area in achieving high spectral efficiency 2-5. By using simple signal
processing with the number of transmit antennas Massive MIMO systems can provide
performance scaling 2. In practice, such benefits can be limited by channel
estimation accuracy 6.
Perfect channel
estimation can be infeasible
for massive MIMO systems due
to orthogonal training sequences for channel estimation are limited either by
the channel coherence time or by the interference from multiple users in
neighboring cells.

To solve the problems engaged in  channel estimation for massive
MIMO
systems, most of
the recent works considered the time-division duplexing (TDD) technique in which reciprocity benefits are used
for exploiting channel reciprocity 6, 1.  In
 this  case,
 the  pilot overhead related problems for  channel estimation can  be reduced by using uplink channel sounding because the required
orthogonal training sequences become
dependent on  the  number
of serviced users and independent
of
the number of transmit
antenna  at  the  base  station. In the frequency-division duplexing (FDD)
technique, channel estimation for Massive MIMO systems becomes more challenging.
This is due to traditional  small  array
 (e.g.,  two,  four,  or
 eight  antenna) MIMO
channel sounding approaches require far  too  much time overhead. FDD has limited worn on massive MIMO
channel estimation techniques 4, 17.  By
exploiting spatial correlation or closed-loop training
these techniques improves the channel estimation performance. FDD systems require potentially
substantial feedback overhead when ever transmit channel adoption
is needed 10–9

 

This project we
are considering the problem
of downlink channel
estimation in FDD massive MIMO systems. We developed a new pilot beam pattern design for orthogonal pilot sequences
which are bounded by the channel coherence time. To minimize the channel estimation mean square error (MSE) we proposed an efficient algorithm which provides the sequentially optimal pilot beam pattern. By
using  second-order statistics of the channel, the temporal correlation, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) jointly
the pilot beam pattern at each training instance
can be derived.

 

A.Notation

 

         Vectors and matrices are written in boldface with
matrices in capitals. All vectors are column vectors. AT, AH, and A? indicate the transpose, Hermitian transpose, and the complex conjugate of A, respectively. Ai,j   denotes the element of A   at  the  i-th
 row
 and  j-th  column.  diag(d1 , ··· , dn )  is the
 diagonal matrix composed of  elements d1 ,
··· , dn  and

×2

}

diag(A)  gives a vector containing the diagonal elements of matrix  A.  For  a  vector
 a,  we  use  ||a|| for  2-norm. For a matrix A,
tr(A)  and var(A)
denote the trace of A, 
and variance operator, respectively.
The
Kronecker product
is ?, and vec(A) operator creates a column vector by stacking the elements of A
column wise. E{x} represents the expectation of x, and In stands for the identity matrix of size n.

 

II.    SYSTEM MODE L

A.System Set-Up

 

       Here we
are considering a massive MIMO system with Nt  transmit
antennas and a single receive antenna (Nt >>1), as shown in
Fig.
1. The signal received at nth Symbol time is
given by           

          

w

       Where sn is the Nt  × 1 transmitted symbol vector at time n, hn is the Nt  × 1 MISO channel vector at time n, and wn is a zero-mean
independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) complex Gaussian noise at time n
with covariance ?2 .
We assume that under a state-space model the channel is Rayleigh-faded and time-varying, i.e., the ?rst-order stationary Gauss-Markov process gives the channel dynamic.

 

                 

 

By Satisfying Lyapunov equation

 

                  

Where  bk is a zero-mean and temporally independent plant Gaussian vector, a is the temporal fading correlation coefficient.

 

 

 

 

MMSE filter

Tracking

Tracking

                                                 

                                                             

     

                   

  
                                                                                                                                

                                                                                  

                                                        

                 

                        

 

Fig.1.
Massive MIMO system model, n=lM+m

 

For stationary,

 for all k.

 

          Assume that the transmission takes place by  continuously slotting  with M
 consecutive symbols as one slot and each slot is composed of a
data transmission period of Md symbols
and a training period of Mp   symbols (M= Mp+Md). During training  periods,
the channel is estimated by transmitting a
 sequence  of  properly 
designed  known
pilot transmit vectors

 ,

     

.(Note that

 is the pilot beam pattern at time n at training
symbol time n). Unknown
data is transmitted during data transmission periods. During training period, based on the
estimated channel transmit beam forming can be applied.

 

B. Channel Estimation

 

p

           Based on the current and all previous observations we are  considering the  minimum mean square error (MMSE) channel
estimation during training periods, i.e.,

where

 is all observations made
during the pilot transmission
up to symbol time n, and is given by

 

                        

The system equation (1) can be rewritten as

 

               

Then,  (2) and (4) form a state-space model and the optimal channel estimation is given by Kalman ?ltering and prediction applied
to this state-space model 11. During the
training period, a measurement update step at each and every symbol time is
available due 
to  the
 known pilot  pattern, and
 the  Kalman
channel estimate and the error covariance matrix are given by 11

                  

 

                   

                       

 With

and

,where

                      

and 

 and

are the  prediction error and estimation covariance
matrices, respectively, and is defined as

 

           

 

Where, 

 During the data transmission period,
based on the last channel estimate of previous training period the channel
is predicted
without the measurement Update step as 11

                

     

Where i  = 1,…, Md.
 During the data transmission period, based on the current channel estimate the transmit beam
forming can be applied

 Eigen-beam
forming 5, 16 can be applied for maximum rate of transmission. Based on the current channel estimate, the beam forming weight vector for maximal ratio transmit beam forming is given by

 

                                        

where dk is the k-th data symbol with signal power

 

III.  THE PROPOSE D PIL OT BEAM
PATTERN DESIGN

     In
this section,
for channel estimation we proposed the best pilot beam pattern design method by considering
the estimation of Mean Square Error (MSE) criterion in the previous section.
Both signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the training based channel capacity 14
are directly related to channel estimation MSE.

               

Note equation
(9) shows that during the l-th data transmission period the  channel
 estimation  error
 depends  only
 on  Rh,  a  and the  estimation
 error  covariance  matrix

 at  the last pilot symbol time. By properly designing the pilot
 beam  pattern  sequence

, we need to minimize the estimation MSE,

 at the last pilot symbol time, Since a  and Rh are given.

        Note that

 is a function of

. S should be jointly optimized to minimize the MSE  at time

. Since the impact
of S on  

 is intertwined,
such joint optimization is too complicated. Since the MSE at

 for each and every

should be optimized for the

-th data transmission period, furthermore optimal channel
estimation at

 for some l is not the only optimization goal. Hence, to design the pilot beam pattern sequence
we adopted a greedy sequential optimization approach. That is, at
time n we optimized pilot

 to minimize

 given

 at all pilot
symbol time

 starting from n==1

 

Problem 1:
 

 is given for  each pilot symbol time starting from 1 to n,  for
all pilot symbol time

, design

 such that

 

                             

                              

       In MIMO systems we need to perform
channel estimation at each receiver antenna separately. So in this project, we are considering
the
MISO case only. The MISO result obtained here can
be directly applied
to MIMO systems. Joint processing across the multiple receive antennas of MIMO systems for channel estimation
is beyond the
scope of the current project.

 

A.     
The proposed Algorithm

 

The following
proposition gives the solution to the problem 1 in MISO case.

 

Proposition 1: A scaled dominant eigenvector of the error covariance matrix of
Kalman prediction for time n gives all the 
previous pilot sn’ (n’