Character example of reasoning and acting which runs

Character is what defines
an individual. It is the first thing you notice about someone and the first
thing you remember about them. In Wright’s, After You Believe, Wright portrays
human character as an example of reasoning and acting which runs directly
through someone. On the off chance that a man neglects to show consistency of
goodness within the sight of adversity, the individual’s actual nature ends up
noticeably evident and that is the moment that character is endangered. An
individual might be apparently modest, but will act completely different in a
difficult situation.

                With
a specific end goal to show true character, one must experience character
change. This change sets a persons esteems and serves as the basis for their
thought process and behavior. As indicated by Wright, this change process has
three steps. The stages include, targeting the correct goal, determining the phases
one should to take to get to that goal, and generating a practice of those
steps.  At the end of the day what it
comes down to is sticking to plan until it becomes second nature.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

 

THE MORAL FRAMEWORKS OF
BIBLICAL AND GREEK THOUGHTS

            Wright explains the connection between Biblical thought and
Greek thought on character and the character transformation. If you read
Aristotle’s theory it is extremely similar to Wrights. Aristotle also has a
three step plan. His plan includes the goal, what it takes to reach the goals
that have been set, and turning those strengths into actual habits. Aristotle
also believed that in order for a person to be come ideal the person must have
certain virtues. These virtues are, bravery, integrity, carefulness, and teetotalism.
He refers to the succession of obtaining these virtues as eudaimonia. Even
though there are similarities between the two theories, evolution did what it
does best, evolve. Wrights theory goes further by including being accepted into
heaven. He also makes it clear that there are clear distinctions between the two.
Although the points are the same, the means to achieve them are different. This
is where religion becomes even more important than it was before. Wright
believes that there are other traits a person must have to build character. Kindness
and humility are among these traits.         

While
Wright’s accentuation on self-restraint through the development of every day
propensities to achieve an objective are legitimate, change at last requires an
adjustment in heart by the heavenly working of the Holy Spirit. Most religions
and beliefs have systems based on self-discipline. For example, the goal in
Hinduism is Nirvana. No matter how true, this does not take away from the
pureness of Christianity. depicts his way of life of subjecting his tissue to
his long lasting quest for the endless prize by saying, “No, I strike a blow to
my body and make it my slave so that after I have preached to others, I myself
will not be disqualified for the prize.” 

 

FIVE PRACTICES OF
EXEMPLARY LEADERSHIP

            On the off chance that the change procedure of
self-control and crafted by the Holy Spirit produces veritable character,
Kouzes and Posner’s five practices of model authority can likewise be
communicated through this change procedure. The five practices incorporate
displaying the route for others through customized esteems, moving a common
vision, testing the procedure by spearheading vision, empowering others to act
by building trust and including others in the vision, and empowering the heart
through perceiving the commitments of others. John C. Maxwell elucidates the
initiative routine with regards to displaying the path by stressing the
standard of chipping away at oneself preceding taking a shot at others. Instead
of changing individuals keeping in mind the end goal to lead them towards a
dream, a pioneer should first change themselves and figure out how to lead
themselves. To pioneer a dream, a man’s life must line up with his or her
message. Jesus is the ideal model of how pioneers should lead with their lives.
After Jesus washed the feet of his pupils, He said to them, “Now that I,
your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you likewise should wash each
other’s feet. I have set you an illustration that you ought to do as I have
improved the situation you.” Jesus lowered Himself and displayed servanthood
for His pupils so they may lead others by His case.

 

MORAL FLEXIBILITY VS.
Trustworthiness OF VALUES

 

            Badaracco presents the idea of good adaptability in his
perceptions of the incredible Okonkwo from African writing. As the boss inborn
pioneer of Umuofia, Okonkwo’s childhood makes him build up the character
qualities of quality, boldness, and steadiness. He holds solidly to his own
feelings and the customs of Umuofia. In any case, Okonkwo’s disappointments
uncover his actual good code after he beats one of his spouses and lies about
it amid the Week of Peace. As opposed to adjusting his feelings to the worries
and estimations of his group, Okonkwo clung to his conventional esteems at the
cost of his connections. Towards the finish of his life, Okonkwo went into
banish while Umuofia grasped the change and impact of Westerners. At long last,
Okonkwo confers the best demonstration of weakness as a pioneer and slaughters
himself.

 

            Moral adaptability is described by moral codes that
adjust to each fluctuating circumstance and grasp a more extensive arrangement
of human esteems by understanding them at an individual and passionate level.
As Badaracco portrays, an ethical code must supersede individual feelings and
adjust to the feelings and requirements of the group. The division between
Badaracco’s ethical adaptability and Kouzes and Posner’s honesty of qualities
is the essential determinant of good esteems. The possibility of good
adaptability depends on the outside condition. In this circumstance, the
determinant of a man’s esteems is the earth and group a man discovers him or
herself in. The wellspring of an ethical code, as per moral adaptability, isn’t
an arrangement of constant standards, yet concordance with the regularly
changing condition and the all inclusive estimations of human pride, love, and
altruism. Then again, the uprightness of qualities depends on a disguised
establishment of qualities. The determinant of these qualities is the person’s
close to home feelings in view of constant standards.

 

Instead of having one way
or the other in building up an ethical code, there must be a sensitive harmony
between tolerating entirely by the ethical code and having adaptability. By
entirely clinging to the ethical code, Jesus could have stoned the
double-crossing lady, who was denounced by the Pharisees. Then again, by having
adaptability in the ethical code, God could have yielded from judging the
Israelites when they worshiped the brilliant calf in the abandon and enabled
them to sustain excessive admiration. As Christians, we should build up an
ethical code that is lined up with the constant, inerrant Scriptures. In the
meantime, we should comprehend the core of God and the soul behind the law with
a specific end goal to apply it His Word to our lives.