The and moreover she exempted nobles from direct

The state of the Hispanic kingdoms in 1469 was such that Isabella and Ferdinand would inevitably have a sizeable legacy to contend with. Consequently a number of short-term measures were necessary yet provided problems to the monarchs in the future years of their reigns. In assessing their successes we must therefore consider these and the effect they were to have on their policies. To a certain extent however it suited Isabella to exaggerate the problems she faced in that contemporaries would hold a more favourable opinion of her.

The most significant legacy of Henry IV was the issue of succession and his ambivalent statements over who was heir to the Castilian throne. In 1468 Henry acknowledged his half-sister Isabella as heir and accepted her marriage to Ferdinand of Aragon. However only months later Henry swapped allegiance to his daughter Joanna. The issue divided the nobility in its support and civil unrest plagued the country for the next ten years. That in December 1474 Isabella was crowned Queen of Castile and by February had the support of most Castilian cities is testament to her political ability and Ferdinand’s military leadership.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Ferdinand’s military importance was seen most clearly in the battle of Toro in March 1476 when he effectively quashed Alfonso’s invasion. To a large degree however it was the marriage itself, which drew significant support from the nobility who recognised the benefits of peaceful and compliant relations with Aragon. Furthermore Isabella made a number of attractive promises, such as assuring never to alienate Crown land and widespread dispension of royal patronage. These two measures in particular proved a hindrance in future years of her reign as the nobility-exploited privileges and endangered the independence of a number of cities.

For example Vallodolid, which became the centre of administration, was under the control of the Count of Benavente. Also in Extremadura and Andalucia violence was suppressed with the promise not to request more special taxation, a measure which potentially handicapped Isabella financially in the future. Woodward summarises the situation by suggesting that “Isabella and Ferdinand were compromised from the beginning of their reign by incompatible promises. ” Isabella successfully held a tight line between not alienating the nobility and yet affirming their support, which remained critical throughout her rule.

In 1480 the Toledo Cortes agreed she should seize back all the land, gifts and pensions issued by Henry between 1464 and 1474. In return however she confirmed rights to land issued before this date and moreover she exempted nobles from direct taxation and allowed them to collect the alcabala tax, a sales tax of 10%. Essentially she therefore seized a lump sum of nearly 30m Maravedis in sacrifice of considerable steady income. To dismiss this as short-sighted would be wrong however given the deficiencies of agriculture and industry at the time.

The state of agriculture during the reign of the Isabella improved little. The dominance of sheep industry over arable farming, and the privileges it enjoyed, led to severe food shortages after 1504. In an attempt to exploit the thriving mesta, common land used for arable farming was returned to pasture. Consequently in a time of inefficient farming techniques and a rising population grain prices inflated. When price controls were imposed farmers were therefore discouraged from selling.

In Aragon, Ferdinand’s reluctance to favour the sheep industry and offer privileges like Isabella had done in Castile, maintained a solid agricultural system. The foreign policy of the Catholic Monarchs was largely successful in achieving its aims. Certain foreign acquisitions however brought with them a number of problems. The conquest of Granada can be regarded as one of the greatest successes of both leaders. The War was largely funded as a crusade by the papacy so put little more stress on the struggling economy.

The rest was funded through a combination of taxation on towns, Jews and the Hermandad and loans taken from Castilian nobles. There also appear numerous other successes of the conquest. Ferdinand showed impressive military leadership and Isabella’s thorough organisation of supplies for the army was a critical factor. Furthermore, the advent of artillery helped siege towns faster and more effectively. Rightfully both Monarchs received considerable prestige from the campaign and so a sense of unity between Castile and Aragon was created.